Why you think you’re right — even if you’re wrong By Julia Galef:

Why you think you’re right — even if you’re wrong
By Julia Galef:

So I’d like you to imagine for a moment that you’re a soldier in the heat of battle. Maybe you’re a Roman foot soldier or a medieval archer or maybe you’re a Zulu warrior. Regardless of your time and place, there are some things that are constant. Your adrenaline is elevated, and your actions are stemming from these deeply ingrained reflexes, reflexes rooted in a need to protect yourself and your side and to defeat the enemy.

So now, I’d like you to imagine playing a very different role, that of the scout. The scout’s job is not to attack or defend. The scout’s job is to understand. The scout is the one going out, mapping the terrain, identifying potential obstacles. And the scout may hope to learn that, say, there’s a bridge in a convenient location across a river. But above all, the scout wants to know what’s really there, as accurately as possible. And in a real, actual army, both the soldier and the scout are essential. But you can also think of each of these roles as a mindset a metaphor for how all of us process information and ideas in our daily lives. What I’m going to argue today is that having good judgment, making accurate predictions, making good decisions, is mostly about which mindset you’re in.

To illustrate these mindsets in action, I’m going to take you back to 19th-century France, where this innocuous-looking piece of paper launched one of the biggest political scandals in history. It was discovered in 1894 by officers in the French general staff. It was torn up in a wastepaper basket, but when they pieced it back together, they discovered that someone in their ranks had been selling military secrets to Germany.

So they launched a big investigation, and their suspicions quickly converged on this man, Alfred Dreyfus.He had a sterling record, no past history of wrongdoing, no motive as far as they could tell. ButDreyfus was the only Jewish officer at that rank in the army, and unfortunately at this time, the French Army was highly anti-Semitic. They compared Dreyfus’s handwriting to that on the memo and concluded that it was a match, even though outside professional handwriting experts were much less confident in the similarity,but never mind that. They went and searched Dreyfus’s apartment, looking for any signs of espionage.They went through his files, and they didn’t find anything. This just convinced them more that Dreyfus was not only guilty, but sneaky as well, because clearly he had hidden all of the evidence before they had managed to get to it.

Next, they went and looked through his personal history for any incriminating details. They talked to his teachers, they found that he had studied foreign languages in school, which clearly showed a desire to conspire with foreign governments later in life. His teachers also said that Dreyfus was known for having a good memory, which was highly suspicious, right? You know, because a spy has to remember a lot of things.

So the case went to trial, and Dreyfus was found guilty. Afterwards, they took him out into this public square and ritualistically tore his insignia from his uniform and broke his sword in two. This was called the Degradation of Dreyfus. And they sentenced him to life imprisonment on the aptly named Devil’s Island,which is this barren rock off the coast of South America. So there he went, and there he spent his days alone, writing letters and letters to the French government begging them to reopen his case so they could discover his innocence. But for the most part, France considered the matter closed.

One thing that’s really interesting to me about the Dreyfus Affair is this question of why the officers were so convinced that Dreyfus was guilty. I mean, you might even assume that they were setting him up, that they were intentionally framing him. But historians don’t think that’s what happened. As far as we can tell,the officers genuinely believed that the case against Dreyfus was strong. Which makes you wonder: What does it say about the human mind that we can find such paltry evidence to be compelling enough to convict a man?

Well, this is a case of what scientists call “motivated reasoning.” It’s this phenomenon in which our unconscious motivations, our desires and fears, shape the way we interpret information. Some information, some ideas, feel like our allies. We want them to win. We want to defend them. And other information or ideas are the enemy, and we want to shoot them down. So this is why I call motivated reasoning, “soldier mindset.”

Probably most of you have never persecuted a French-Jewish officer for high treason, I assume, but maybe you’ve followed sports or politics, so you might have noticed that when the referee judges that your team committed a foul, for example, you’re highly motivated to find reasons why he’s wrong. But if he judges that the other team committed a foul — awesome! That’s a good call, let’s not examine it too closely. Or, maybe you’ve read an article or a study that examined some controversial policy, like capital punishment. And, as researchers have demonstrated, if you support capital punishment and the study shows that it’s not effective, then you’re highly motivated to find all the reasons why the study was poorly designed. But if it shows that capital punishment works, it’s a good study. And vice versa: if you don’t support capital punishment, same thing.

Our judgment is strongly influenced, unconsciously, by which side we want to win. And this is ubiquitous.This shapes how we think about our health, our relationships, how we decide how to vote, what we consider fair or ethical. What’s most scary to me about motivated reasoning or soldier mindset, is how unconscious it is. We can think we’re being objective and fair-minded and still wind up ruining the life of an innocent man.

However, fortunately for Dreyfus, his story is not over. This is Colonel Picquart. He’s another high-ranking officer in the French Army, and like most people, he assumed Dreyfus was guilty. Also like most people in the army, he was at least casually anti-Semitic. But at a certain point, Picquart began to suspect: “What if we’re all wrong about Dreyfus?” What happened was, he had discovered evidence that the spying for Germany had continued, even after Dreyfus was in prison. And he had also discovered that another officer in the army had handwriting that perfectly matched the memo, much closer than Dreyfus’s handwriting. So he brought these discoveries to his superiors, but to his dismay, they either didn’t care or came up with elaborate rationalizations to explain his findings, like, “Well, all you’ve really shown, Picquart, is that there’s another spy who learned how to mimic Dreyfus’s handwriting, and he picked up the torch of spying after Dreyfus left. But Dreyfus is still guilty.” Eventually, Picquart managed to get Dreyfus exonerated. But it took him 10 years, and for part of that time, he himself was in prison for the crime of disloyalty to the army.

A lot of people feel like Picquart can’t really be the hero of this story because he was an anti-Semite and that’s bad, which I agree with. But personally, for me, the fact that Picquart was anti-Semitic actually makes his actions more admirable, because he had the same prejudices, the same reasons to be biasedas his fellow officers, but his motivation to find the truth and uphold it trumped all of that.

So to me, Picquart is a poster child for what I call “scout mindset.” It’s the drive not to make one idea win or another lose, but just to see what’s really there as honestly and accurately as you can, even if it’s not pretty or convenient or pleasant. This mindset is what I’m personally passionate about. And I’ve spent the last few years examining and trying to figure out what causes scout mindset. Why are some people, sometimes at least, able to cut through their own prejudices and biases and motivations and just try to see the facts and the evidence as objectively as they can?

And the answer is emotional. So, just as soldier mindset is rooted in emotions like defensiveness or tribalism, scout mindset is, too. It’s just rooted in different emotions. For example, scouts are curious.They’re more likely to say they feel pleasure when they learn new information or an itch to solve a puzzle.They’re more likely to feel intrigued when they encounter something that contradicts their expectations.Scouts also have different values. They’re more likely to say they think it’s virtuous to test your own beliefs, and they’re less likely to say that someone who changes his mind seems weak. And above all, scouts are grounded, which means their self-worth as a person isn’t tied to how right or wrong they are about any particular topic. So they can believe that capital punishment works. If studies come out showing that it doesn’t, they can say, “Huh. Looks like I might be wrong. Doesn’t mean I’m bad or stupid.”

This cluster of traits is what researchers have found — and I’ve also found anecdotally — predicts good judgment. And the key takeaway I want to leave you with about those traits is that they’re primarily not about how smart you are or about how much you know. In fact, they don’t correlate very much with IQ at all. They’re about how you feel. There’s a quote that I keep coming back to, by Saint-Exupéry. He’s the author of “The Little Prince.” He said, “If you want to build a ship, don’t drum up your men to collect wood and give orders and distribute the work. Instead, teach them to yearn for the vast and endless sea.”

In other words, I claim, if we really want to improve our judgment as individuals and as societies, what we need most is not more instruction in logic or rhetoric or probability or economics, even though those things are quite valuable. But what we most need to use those principles well is scout mindset. We need to change the way we feel. We need to learn how to feel proud instead of ashamed when we notice we might have been wrong about something. We need to learn how to feel intrigued instead of defensive when we encounter some information that contradicts our beliefs.

So the question I want to leave you with is: What do you most yearn for? Do you yearn to defend your own beliefs? Or do you yearn to see the world as clearly as you possibly can?

Julia Galef: Why you think you’re right — even if you’re wrong

11218828_1518749335116434_5184118596286537639_n 14425371_1779289848961450_3179114011329881516_o 14614487_1122361917817435_456928420_o 14633192_641017329392611_5932703609944899310_o 14914517_1606619899351783_1924795878_n 14914601_1606705626009877_1829621723_n 14914622_1606467872700319_154517861_n 14914833_1605693686111071_1282881705_n 14915015_1606375456042894_840471364_n 14936988_1608182772528829_730351249_n 14937007_1607648642582242_1069189903_n 14937841_1612118985468541_1081941402_n-1 14937841_1612118985468541_1081941402_n-2 14937841_1612118985468541_1081941402_n 14937907_1613176078696165_77416439_n 14937940_1606878749325898_1738163377_n 14937942_1606921619321611_1746197277_n-1 14937942_1606921619321611_1746197277_n 14937981_1612152148798558_1059720873_n 14958414_1612216018792171_1741416656_n 14958500_1607996452547461_122646227_n 14958637_1607996432547463_236650625_n 14958653_1608221235858316_1464520600_n 14958832_1612011998812573_454990368_n 14958841_1607600832587023_279477740_n 14961329_1605600922787014_733284889_n 14961447_1605695122777594_1956870488_n 14961472_1613031408710632_330747539_n 14961514_1606714799342293_1610289400_n 14962225_1606714106009029_753410186_n 14962305_1607787739234999_254020571_n 14962336_1611722968841476_2061316513_n 14962353_1612837638730009_1549294553_n 14962500_1612838855396554_1492144414_n 14962511_1613109212036185_1929128437_n 14962871_1605621876118252_305244063_n 14963091_1605439419469831_89762127_n 14971175_1612135685466871_139866522_n 14971235_1606752482671858_710703960_n 14971242_1613050685375371_412858168_n 14971255_1614348808578892_809723578_n 14971373_1610210622326044_926585656_n 14971951_1611905095489930_883110642_n 14976718_1152043938219580_2734210654812228657_o 14976807_1813006485639572_4699294495302475780_o 14996298_1614379651909141_634332624_n 14996336_1608183085862131_755431684_n 14996377_1613032075377232_1539769609_n 14996561_1614782215202218_838971994_n 15000094_1813006492306238_4894550218055787313_o 15007993_296881194038735_1351940223_o 15025248_1813006488972905_9221114773113084563_o-1 15025248_1813006488972905_9221114773113084563_o 15033679_1614849531862153_1087699789_n 15033799_1613091608704612_278099317_n 15045772_1613183288695444_869103112_n 15046337_1614726988541074_1345844199_n 15050298_1614709008542872_1675295593_n 15058022_1615661618447611_1976277024_n 15058690_1624779327535840_1321274720_n 15086193_1626230230724083_1905141227_n 15086259_1627105297303243_1230249081_n 15086331_1624679504212489_635321023_n 15086356_1624829264197513_1008314846_n-1 15086356_1624829264197513_1008314846_n-copy 15086356_1624829264197513_1008314846_n 15086400_1627105363969903_1364340198_n 15086948_1628597910487315_599094522_n 15087037_1624829514197488_1033131766_n-copy 15087037_1624829514197488_1033131766_n 15128533_1627292083951231_1055928556_n-1 15128533_1627292083951231_1055928556_n 15128657_1628560693824370_217994201_n 15129824_1626222907391482_295864490_n 15129845_1627291630617943_465917072_n 15134236_1628519853828454_1798915989_n-1 15134236_1628519853828454_1798915989_n 15134289_1627324513947988_317428252_n 15135476_1626223010724805_1145952789_n-1 15135476_1626223010724805_1145952789_n 15135717_1624770390870067_889382187_n 15139542_1626061954074244_2053011617_n 15139799_1624762647537508_37679741_n 15151455_1628194127194360_1435076393_n-1 15151455_1628194127194360_1435076393_n fcb70654dc2e2f511e326b93a6240e2e flyer-of-nos

Yaada Keessan kan toora FB kanaa gadirratti kennaa